Login Paper Search My Schedule Paper Index Help

My SLT 2018 Schedule

Note: Your custom schedule will not be saved unless you create a new account or login to an existing account.
  1. Create a login based on your email (takes less than one minute)
  2. Perform 'Paper Search'
  3. Select papers that you desire to save in your personalized schedule
  4. Click on 'My Schedule' to see the current list of selected papers
  5. Click on 'Printable Version' to create a separate window suitable for printing (the header and menu will appear, but will not actually print)

Paper Detail

Presentation #7
Session:Corpora and Evaluation Methodologies
Session Time:Wednesday, December 19, 13:30 - 15:30
Presentation Time:Wednesday, December 19, 13:30 - 15:30
Presentation: Poster
Topic: Evaluation methodologies:
Paper Title: Improved Auto-Marking Confidence for Spoken Language Assessment
Authors: Marco Del Vecchio; University of Cambridge 
 Andrey Malinin; University of Cambridge 
 Mark Gales; University of Cambridge 
Abstract: Automatic assessment of spoken language proficiency is a sought-after technology. These systems often need to handle the operating scenario where candidates have a skill level or first language which was not encountered during the training stage. For high stakes tests it is necessary for those systems to have good grading performance when the candidate is from the same population as those contained in the training set, and they should know when they are likely to perform badly in the case when the candidate is not from the same population as the ones contained in training set. This paper focuses on using Deep Density Networks to yield auto-marking confidence. Firstly, we explore the benefits of parametrising either a predictive distribution or a posterior distribution over the parameters of the model likelihood and obtaining the predictive distribution via marginalisation. Secondly, we investigate how it is possible to act on the parametrised density in order to explicitly teach the model to have low confidence in areas of the observation space where there is no training data by assigning confidence scores to artificially generated data. Lastly, we compare the capabilities of Factor Analysis, Variational Auto-Encodes, and Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks to generate artificial data.